<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Solicitors Online BlogOver the pond | The Solicitors Online Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.solicitorsonlineblog.co.uk/tag/over-the-pond/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.solicitorsonlineblog.co.uk</link>
	<description>Musings from an online lawyer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:42:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>

		<item>
		<title>Florida supreme court gets tough on lawyers websites</title>
		<link>http://www.solicitorsonlineblog.co.uk/2009/11/30/florida-supreme-court-gets-tough-on-lawyers-websites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.solicitorsonlineblog.co.uk/2009/11/30/florida-supreme-court-gets-tough-on-lawyers-websites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tessa Shepperson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Over the pond]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solicitorsonlineblog.co.uk/?p=103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This blog is mainly about British lawyers, however I was somewhat startled to read this article in the Florida Bar News. This states that from January 2010, lawyer websites (in Florida that is) will be subject to strict advertising standards, which will include no testimonials, no details of past results and no statements characterising the...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.solicitorsonlineblog.co.uk%2F2009%2F11%2F30%2Fflorida-supreme-court-gets-tough-on-lawyers-websites%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.solicitorsonlineblog.co.uk%2F2009%2F11%2F30%2Fflorida-supreme-court-gets-tough-on-lawyers-websites%2F&amp;source=TessaShepperson&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>This blog is mainly about British lawyers, however I was somewhat startled to read <a href="http://www.floridabar.org/DIVCOM/JN/jnnews01.nsf/8c9f13012b96736985256aa900624829/246485a6d9ed694f85257677004ed337!OpenDocument" target="_blank">this article</a> in the Florida Bar News.</p>
<p>This states that from January 2010, lawyer websites (in Florida that is) will be subject to strict advertising standards, which will include no testimonials, no details of past results and no statements characterising the quality of the law services being rendered.</p>
<p>I bet completing services which are not subject to the Florida bar are really pleased about this!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.floridabar.org/DIVCOM/JN/jnnews01.nsf/8c9f13012b96736985256aa900624829/246485a6d9ed694f85257677004ed337!OpenDocument" target="_blank">You can read the article here.</a></p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://www.solicitorsonlineblog.co.uk/2009/05/25/the-internet-newsletter/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">The Internet Newsletter</a></li><li><a href="http://www.solicitorsonlineblog.co.uk/2009/06/06/social-media-whats-the-point-part-1/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Social Media &#8211; Whats the point? (Part 1)</a></li><li><a href="http://www.solicitorsonlineblog.co.uk/2010/01/15/the-uk-supreme-court-it-revolutionary-or-rubbish/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">The UK Supreme Court IT &#8211; revolutionary or rubbish?</a></li><li><a href="http://www.solicitorsonlineblog.co.uk/2009/08/05/quality-solicitors-the-scottish-experience/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Quality Solicitors &#8211; the Scottish Experience</a></li><li><a href="http://www.solicitorsonlineblog.co.uk/2009/11/04/contact-law-%e2%80%93-making-tesco-law-work-for-solicitors/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Contact Law – making Tesco Law work for solicitors</a></li><li>Powered by <a href="http://ajaydsouza.com/wordpress/plugins/contextual-related-posts/">Contextual Related Posts</a></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.solicitorsonlineblog.co.uk/2009/11/30/florida-supreme-court-gets-tough-on-lawyers-websites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.solicitorsonlineblog.co.uk @ 2012-02-04 13:36:21 -->
