<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Solicitors Online Bloglegal IT | The Solicitors Online Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.solicitorsonlineblog.co.uk/tag/legal-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.solicitorsonlineblog.co.uk</link>
	<description>Musings from an online lawyer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:42:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>

		<item>
		<title>The UK Supreme Court IT &#8211; revolutionary or rubbish?</title>
		<link>http://www.solicitorsonlineblog.co.uk/2010/01/15/the-uk-supreme-court-it-revolutionary-or-rubbish/</link>
		<comments>http://www.solicitorsonlineblog.co.uk/2010/01/15/the-uk-supreme-court-it-revolutionary-or-rubbish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tessa Shepperson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Susskind]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solicitorsonlineblog.co.uk/?p=288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two diametrically opposed articles have caught my eye today, about the new Supreme Court. 1. Richard Susskind writing in the Internet Newsletter for Lawyers (Jan/Feb edition) talks admiringly about the court being the most technologically advanced in the UK, and describes how the Justices can call up documents and court papers with the flick of...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.solicitorsonlineblog.co.uk%2F2010%2F01%2F15%2Fthe-uk-supreme-court-it-revolutionary-or-rubbish%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.solicitorsonlineblog.co.uk%2F2010%2F01%2F15%2Fthe-uk-supreme-court-it-revolutionary-or-rubbish%2F&amp;source=TessaShepperson&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Two diametrically opposed articles have caught my eye today, about the new <a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov.uk/">Supreme Court</a>.</p>
<p>1. Richard Susskind writing in the Internet Newsletter for Lawyers (Jan/Feb edition) talks admiringly about the court being the most technologically advanced in the UK, and describes how the Justices can call up documents and court papers with the flick of a finger.</p>
<p>2. Rupert White however, <a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/court-cost-supreme-court-it-system-was-overpriced-badly-bought">writing in the Law Society Gazette, says it was overpriced and poorly procured</a>.</p>
<p>How can we mere mortals decide?  As Richard Susskind is IT advisor to the Lord Chief Justice, he might be a teensy bit partial though.  Problems with big computer schemes are not unknown in the legal world.  I seem to remember that the Law Society had a bit of a problem a few years ago.</p>
<p>Well we shall have to wait and see how things work out.</p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://www.solicitorsonlineblog.co.uk/2009/11/30/florida-supreme-court-gets-tough-on-lawyers-websites/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Florida supreme court gets tough on lawyers websites</a></li><li><a href="http://www.solicitorsonlineblog.co.uk/2009/05/27/susskind-the-end-of-lawyers/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Susskind &#8211; the end of lawyers?</a></li><li><a href="http://www.solicitorsonlineblog.co.uk/2009/12/19/fear-of-the-unknown-getting-a-grip-on-new-technology/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Fear of the unknown &#8211; getting a grip on new technology</a></li><li><a href="http://www.solicitorsonlineblog.co.uk/2009/06/15/if-one-door-closes/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">If one door closes &#8230;</a></li><li><a href="http://www.solicitorsonlineblog.co.uk/2010/05/20/solicitors-dont-trust-the-government-when-planning-your-career/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Don&#8217;t trust the government when planning your career</a></li><li>Powered by <a href="http://ajaydsouza.com/wordpress/plugins/contextual-related-posts/">Contextual Related Posts</a></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.solicitorsonlineblog.co.uk/2010/01/15/the-uk-supreme-court-it-revolutionary-or-rubbish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.solicitorsonlineblog.co.uk @ 2012-02-04 14:15:56 -->
